Analysis of the exam in social studies in the form of the exam. Analysis of the exam in social studies in the form of the exam Where to see your work

Almost 14% of USE participants in social studies did not overcome the minimum threshold in 2017, and this figure was lower than in 2016. Sergey Kravtsov, head of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science (Rosobrnadzor), told reporters about this.

"The average scores in all three subjects in 2017 are comparable to the results of last year. The number of participants who failed to overcome the established minimum threshold in subjects has decreased: in social studies - to 13.8% from 17.5% last year, in physics - up to 3.8% from 6.1%, according to the literature - up to 2.9% from 4.4% a year earlier", he clarified.

The head of Rosobrnadzor also noted that the results of the USE in these subjects have already been transferred to the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. "The results went to the regions one day earlier", - S. Kravtsov explained.

During the main period, about 318,000 participants took the USE in social science, over 155,000 in physics, and over 41,000 in literature.

The main period of the Unified State Exam-2017 runs from May 29 to July 1. About 703 thousand people plan to take part in the exams, of which about 617 thousand are graduates current year. Examinations are held in all subjects of the Russian Federation, as well as in 52 countries abroad.

Rosobrnadzor summed up the preliminary results of the exam in social science, literature and physics. This year, more students were able to overcome the minimum threshold than last year, the press service of Rosobrnadzor reported, citing the head of the service, Sergei Kravtsov.

. . . . .

Kravtsov explained the decrease in the number of schoolchildren who could not overcome the minimum threshold by the fact that the results of the USE are used in the work of institutes for advanced training of teachers. Thanks to the use of scanning technology for participants' works at the examination points, the results of the USE in social science, literature and physics were processed ahead of schedule established by the schedule for issuing results. Graduates will be able to find out their result a day earlier.

Participants of the Unified State Examination (USE) in the Russian language will be able to find out their results five days ahead of schedule. . . . . .

"Five days earlier, participants will find out their results in the Russian language - this is 700 thousand people, this has never happened, so that schoolchildren can get results and hold graduation balls in peace. This is very important, this is not the case anywhere in the world", - stressed S. Kravtsov.

In turn, the deputy head of Rosobrnadzor Anzor Muzaev noted that the results will be transferred to the regions on June 22, 2017. "On Thursday, June 22, all educational institutions will have data, referring to which they will be able to issue certificates" he explained.

The Unified State Examination in the Russian language was held on June 9. 628 thousand people signed up to participate in the exam, 5.4 thousand examination points (PET) were involved in its conduct. Earlier it was reported that the participants of the exam will know their results no later than June 27, 2017.

. . . . .

Analysis of the exam in social studies in the form of the exam

Number of students: 3

Number of writers: 3

Teacher: Zalevskaya N.I.

Absolute progress: 100%

Analysis of the exam in the form of the exam showed the following:

Part 1 contains 20 short answer tasks, tasks of two difficulty levels: 10 basic level tasks and 10 advanced level tasks. Maximum primary score - 35

In the examination paper, the following types of tasks with a short answer are proposed:

Tasks for choosing and writing one or more correct answers from the proposed list of answers;

The task is to identify the structural elements of concepts using diagrams and tables;

Task to establish the correspondence of positions presented in two sets;

Task for differentiation in social information of facts and opinions;

The task is to define terms and concepts that correspond to the proposed context.

Tasks 1-3 are aimed at testing the knowledge and understanding of the biosocial essence of a person, the main stages and factors of the socialization of the individual, the patterns and trends in the development of society, the main social institutions and processes, etc.

Tasks 4-19 include tasks of basic and advanced levels, aimed at testing the formation of skills: characterize from scientific positions, the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system; search social information presented in various sign systems (text, scheme, table, diagram); apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive problems on topical social problems. The tasks of this group represent the traditional five thematic modules of the social science course: man and society, including cognition and spiritual culture (tasks 4-6); economics (tasks 7-10), social relations (tasks 11, 12); politics (tasks 13-15); law (tasks 16-19).

Task 20 is aimed at testing skills: analyze and summarize disordered social information; making a difference in neufacts and opinions, arguments and conclusions; explain internal and external relations (causal and functional) of the studied social objects (including the interaction of man and society, society and nature, society and culture, subsystems and structural elements of the social system, social qualities of a person.

Part 2 contains 9 tasks with a detailed answer, two tasks of the basic level (21 and 22) and seven tasks of a high level of complexity (23-29). The maximum primary score is 27.

Tasks 21 and 22 are aimed primarily at identifying the ability to find, consciously perceive and accurately reproduce the information contained in the text in an explicit form (task 21), as well as apply it in a given context.

Task 23 is aimed at characterizing (or explaining, or concretizing) the text or its individual provisions based on the studied course, based on contextual social science knowledge.

Task 24 involves the use of text information in a different cognitive situation, independent formulation and argumentation of evaluative, prognostic and other judgments related to the problems of the text.

Task 25 tests the ability to independently reveal the meaning of key social science concepts and apply them in a given context.

Task 26 tests the ability to concretize with examples the studied theoretical positions and concepts of the social sciences that form the social science course.

Task-task 27 requires: analysis of the information provided, including statistical and graphic; connection explanations social facilities, processes; formulation and argumentation of independent evaluative, prognostic and other judgments, explanations, conclusions. This assignment tests the ability to apply

social science knowledge in the process of solving cognitive problems on topical social problems.

Task 28 requires drawing up a plan for a detailed answer on a specific topic in a social science course. When performing tasks of this type, the following skills are revealed: to systematize and generalize social information; establish and reflect in the structure of the plan structural, functional, hierarchical and other connections of social objects, phenomena, processes.

The alternative task 29 completes the work, aiming the examiner to write a mini-essay on one of the five proposed topics.

Tasks 1-3, 10, 12 are evaluated by 1 point. The task is considered completed correctly if the answer is written in the form specified in the instructions for completing the task.

The correct performance of tasks 4-9, 11, 13-20 is estimated by 2 points. These assignments are graded as follows: complete correct execution tasks - 2 points; completion of the task with one error (one incorrectly indicated, including an extra, number along with all the correct numbers) OR incomplete completion of the task (lack of one required number) - 1 point; incorrect performance of the task (when specifying two or more erroneous numbers) - 0 points.

Full correct performance of tasks of part 2 is estimated from 2 to 5 points. For the complete correct completion of tasks 21, 22, 2 points are given; tasks 23-28 - 3 points each; tasks 29 - 5 points.

Total - 29 tasks (62 points).

The analysis showed that students completed the tasks of Part 1 better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 1)

Picture 1.

Comparative analysis of the performance of tasks of the 1st part

The analysis showed that the students completed the tasks of Part 2 better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 2)

Figure 2.

Comparative analysis of the performance of tasks 2 parts

The analysis showed that students improved their performance of tasks at the basic, advanced and high levels (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of task performance (by difficulty levels)

Grade average - 57,7 (on a mock exam - 44,6 ).

Analysis of the task performance showed that the students completed:

- 56 % of tasks of the 1st group (trial - 44% );

- 89 % of tasks from the section "Man and society, including knowledge and spiritual culture" (trial - 44 %);

- 76 % of tasks from the section "Economics" (trial - 45,5 %);

- 78 % of tasks from the section "Social Relations" (trial - 41,5 %);

- 50 % of tasks from the "Politics" section (trial - 50 %);

- 58 % of tasks from the section "Law" (trial - 62 %);

- 100 % of task No. 20 (trial - 66 %);

- 35 % of tasks 2 parts (trial - 11 %).

Difficulties caused tasks 3, 17 ( a basic level of); 15, 18 (elevated level); 24-29 (high level).

Rosobrnadzor summed up the results of the main and additional stages of the USE in 2017. In general, the statistics show that this year's graduates coped with the exams more successfully than last year. About 620 thousand people took part in the exam.

The number of doubles has been halved. So, for example, it happened at the exam in history. In other subjects, the figures vary, but there are indeed fewer unsatisfactory works: in biology - by 0.3%, in chemistry - by 1.1%, in literature - by 1.5%, in physics - by 2%, in social science - by 4%, by foreign languages- by 25%.

The number of participants who scored from 80 to 100 points on the USE in 2017 increased by 2%.

Rosobrnadzor does not lose sight of talented graduates who managed to score the highest score in three subjects at once. This year there were six such guys: two from Yekaterinburg and one each from St. Petersburg, Penza, Perm and Kurgan. In 2016, there were only three three hundred points: from Olenegorsk (Murmansk region), Kemerovo and Kirov.

The number of fraud-related violations has decreased by a quarter compared to the previous year. However, "gets" not only graduates, but also teachers. So, in Ingushetia, a school principal was fired for trying to help students in the Unified State Examination. In all regions, teachers are fired pointwise for accidentally ringing the phone during the exam, as well as for the fact that they "overlooked" the students who brought their phone to the exam. Such cases of demonstrative reprisals (even against honored teachers with twenty years of experience) sometimes cause bewilderment.

But as for the scandals, this year they did not occur at the time of passing the exam, but on appeal. All over the country, USE participants complain about gross non-compliance with the rules of appeal.

In some regions, the conflict commission made a decision to change the scores even before the start of the procedure itself, and notified the graduates after the fact (without the right to appeal, since all the scores were already entered in the final document; naturally, there was no mention of the graduate's signature next to the final grade and speech did not work). In other cases, the organizers prevented both the filing of an appeal and the personal presence of the USE participant at the meeting (for example, by “forgetting” to name the date or deliberately not allowing them to sign the documents necessary for attendance). Graduates also complained that their arguments were not taken into account, and the written justification for the appeal was refused to be filed with the case. The experts did their best to keep the original score, referring to non-existent evaluation criteria and finding fault with the little things that do not affect the scoring at all. All this caused a wave of indignation among the graduates and their families. Appeals to the hotline for the Unified State Examination also did not bring results, since at the opposite end the frustrated parents were told that "the procedure for holding a meeting of the conflict commission will not be disputed."

The flagrant injustice towards the appellants, as well as the negligence in the initial verification of papers - this is what we will remember about the 2017 USE.