International Conference on Harmonization. Report on the research work "Development of the Concept for ensuring the quality of medicines in the Russian Federation

The rapid development of the international pharmaceutical industry in the 70-80s. The 20th century and the globalization of the pharmaceutical market began to be hampered by fragmented national registration systems medicines, primarily differences in technical requirements. Along with this, the growing cost of healthcare costs, research and development work on the creation of new drugs, the need for quick access of the population to modern more effective drugs required harmonization of regulatory requirements. In 1989, at the Paris Conference of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, held annually by WHO, this issue began to be addressed by the regulatory authorities of the US, EU and Japan. In April 1990, representatives of these countries' agencies and manufacturers' associations established the International Conference on Harmonization, the secretariat of which is located in Geneva at the headquarters of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Associations. (IFPMA). The initial task of the ICH was to harmonize the technical requirements for the registration dossier filed in the EU, USA and Japan. As the conference progressed, its tasks were expanded. The main objectives of the ICH for the current decade were defined at its 5th conference in San Diego in 2000:
    creating a forum for constructive dialogue between regulators and the pharmaceutical industry in terms of current and objective differences in registration requirements in the US, EU and Japan in order to ensure faster introduction of new medical products into practice and access to patients; participation in public health protection from international perspectives; monitoring and updating harmonized technical requirements leading to greater mutual recognition of R&D data; avoiding different requirements in the future by harmonizing selected areas necessary for further development of therapy and new technologies for the production of medical products; ensuring the dissemination and understanding of harmonized guidelines and campaigns that update or replace current regulations and allow more economical use of human and material resources without compromising safety; ensuring the dissemination and understanding of harmonized of these guidelines, their use for the implementation and consolidation of common standards.
To date, the ICH has 6 members, 3 observers (without voting rights) and the IFPMA. ICH members are represented by the regulatory authorities of the EU, the US and Japan and the pharmaceutical manufacturers associations of these countries (regions), where it is developed, manufactured and sold the largest number medicines:
    From the European Union, the European Medical Devices Agency (EMEA) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (EFPIA) participate in the work of ICH. From the USA, the ICH includes the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA and the Association of Pharmaceutical Developers and Manufacturers of the USA (PhRMA). From Japan, the Medicines Agency and medical devices The Ministries of Health, Labor and Social Affairs of Japan and the National Institute of Health Sciences, and the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA).
Observers in the ICH are treated as intermediaries with countries and regions outside the ICH. First of all, these are the World Health Organization, the European Free Trade Association, represented by Swissmedic Switzerland, and Canada represented by the Canadian Ministry of Health. The work of the ICH is also supported by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, on the basis of which the ICH secretariat operates. The activities of the ICH are organized by an Executive Committee in which each of the 6 members has 2 voting seats, and the observers and the IFPMA appoint non-voting committee members. The technical functions of organizing the work are carried out by the secretariat of the ICH. The main method for developing guidelines is through the use of Expert Working Groups (EWGs), Implementation Working Groups (IWGs) and informal working groups, with the use of video conferencing and electronic communications also expected in the future. To date, the ICH guidelines are divided into 4 main sections:
    safety

Document ID

Manual title

Mutagenicity studies

S1AThe need for drug mutagenicity studies
S1BTesting for mutagenicity of drugs
S1C(R1)

Dose selection for drug mutagenicity studies and dose limit

S2A

Guidance on specific aspects of regulatory genotoxicity testing for formulations

S2B

Genotoxicity: A Standard Battery for Genotoxicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals

S3A

Guidance Note Toxicokinetics: Estimating Total Exposure in Toxicity Studies

S3B

Pharmacokinetics: Guidelines for the Study of Repeated Dose Tissue Distribution

Toxicity test

S4Single dose toxicity testing
S4ADuration of Chronic Animal Toxicity Tests (Rodent and Non-Rodent Toxicity Test)

Generative toxicology

S5(R2)Detection of Reproductive Toxicity of Medicinal Products and Reproductive Toxicity in Males
S5AICH Support Male Fertility Toxicity Guidelines

Biotech Products

S6Assessment of preclinical safety of biotechnologically derived drugs

Pharmacology research

S7ASafety pharmacology studies for human drugs
S7BNon-Clinical Evaluation of the Potential for Delayed Ventricular Repolarization (QT Intermediate Prolongation) of Drugs in Humans

Immunotoxicological studies

S8Immunotoxicological studies on drugs for humans
    efficiency

Clinical Trial Safety

E1The number of patients who are subjected to a clinical study of the safety of medicines intended for long-term treatment non-life threatening conditions
E2AClinical safety data management: definitions and standards for an urgent report
E2B(R3)Clinical Safety Data Management: Data Element for Carrying Special Case Safety Messages
E2C(R1)Clinical safety data management: Periodic update of marketed drug safety reporting E2C Annex: Periodic update of marketed drug safety reporting in E2C(R1))
E2DPost-Launch Security Data Management: Definitions and Reporting Standards
E2EPharmacovigilance planning

Clinical Research Reports

E3Structure and content of Clinical Research Reports

Dose response studies

E4Dose-effect information for entering data into the registration dossier

Ethnic factors

E5(R1)Ethnic factors in the acceptability of foreign clinical data

GCP(Good Clinical Practice)

E6(R1)GCP (Good Clinical Practice)

Clinical Trials

E7Evidence-based studies in specific populations: geriatrics
E8Primary Consideration of Clinical Trials
E9Statistical principles for clinical trials
E10Control group selection and related data in clinical trials
E11Clinical study of medical products on children

Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation by Therapeutic Category

E12Principles of clinical evaluation of new antihypertensive drugs

Clinical Assessment

E14Clinical assessment of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs

Pharmacogenomics

E15Terminology in pharmacogenomics
    quality
List of ICH documents in the Quality section
Document ID

Manual title

Stability

Q1A(R2)Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
Q1BStability Testing: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
Q1CStability Testing for New Dosage Forms
Q1DBracketing and Matrixing Designs for Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
Q1EEvaluation of Stability Data
Q1FStability Data Package for Registration Applications in Climatic Zones III and IV

Validation

Q2(R1)new title: Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Previously: Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures New title: "Validation of Analytical Methods: Content and Methodology" replacing the guidelines "Content of Validation of Analytical Procedures" and "Validation of Analytical Methods: Methodology"
impurities
Q3A(R2)Impurities in New Drug Substances
Q3B(R2)Impurities in New Drug Products
Q3C(R2)Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents
Pharmacopoeia
Q4Pharmacopoeias"Pharmacopoeias"
Q4APharmacopoeial Harmonization
Q4BRegulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC)
Quality of biotech products
Q5A(R1)Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin
Q5BQuality of Biotechnological Products: Analysis of the Expression Construct in Cells Used for Production of r-DNA Derived Protein Products
Q5CQuality of Biotechnological Products: Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products assessment of the stability of biotechnological/biological preparations”
Q5DDerivation and Characterization of Cell Substrates Used for Production of Biotechnological/Biological Products
Q5EComparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in their Manufacturing Process
Specifications
Q6ASpecifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances (including Decision Trees)
Q6BSpecifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products
Good Manufacturing Practice
Q7Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
Development of pharmaceutical products
Q8Pharmaceutical Development"Development of pharmaceutical products"
Quality risk management
Q9Quality Risk Management"Quality Risk Management"
Q10Pharmaceutical Quality system "Quality system at a pharmaceutical enterprise" Stage 3.

The introduction of uniform standards at the international level is a rather long process, especially if these standards relate to complex processes. Nevertheless, the harmonization of regulatory requirements in the pharmaceutical sector at the global level is gaining momentum. At the root of this trend lies the ever-increasing degree of globalization of the pharmaceutical industry itself. In addition to improving efficiency, regulatory harmonization should ultimately ensure that quality medicines are widely available to all those who need them, no matter where they are geographically.

At present, the harmonization process is still far from an acceptable level. This leads to significant losses of time and money in the pharmaceutical industry. For example, according to a survey by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), in some cases the cost of preparing dossiers for new drug can amount to 15-20% of the cost of clinical trials, in which hundreds of millions of dollars are invested. The study showed that there are a large number of inspection organizations, partly unnecessary, that require hundreds of thousands of dollars a day to operate. Indeed, from 1000 to 2500 man-hours are spent on the inspection of one production. Harmonization of approaches to the preparation of dossiers, the introduction of uniform standards for the inspection of production facilities would help to avoid unnecessary costs in the pharmaceutical sector as a whole and direct the saved resources to solving the necessary tasks. (Europe Today)

Significant progress has been made over the past five years in the area of ​​standardization of R&D and clinical trial requirements, as well as harmonization of regulatory requirements for finished products. dosage forms, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients.

The main driving force behind regulatory harmonization in the pharmaceutical sector is the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). For 21 years now, ICH has been committed to eliminating redundant documentation and simplifying the process of developing, manufacturing and registering pharmaceuticals. The ICH is made up of regulators, pharmacopoeias, and drug manufacturers from the US, Japan, and Europe. This organization has developed general approach to the problem of harmonization and set priorities for the implementation of this complex and multilateral project.

In addition to the ICH, a number of other organizations are involved in the harmonization of regulatory requirements in the pharmaceutical sector, for example, the US Committee (US Pharmacopeias Discussion Group). The World Health Organization is also involved in the harmonization process, as is the Pan American Society for the Harmonization of Drug Regulation. Other groups involved in the harmonization of regulatory requirements in different countries have concentrated their efforts on individual problems in the field of active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients.

Some progress in harmonization

An example is the progress made by the United States and European countries in harmonizing regulatory requirements in the pharmaceutical sectors of these countries. By applying the ICH recommendations on quality standards and using a common format for technical documentation, the US and Europe have come up with a single dossier form for a number of drugs.

Japan, which was moving along the path of national standards five years ago, is now showing significant interest in cooperation in the direction of harmonization of regulatory requirements in pharmaceuticals.

Perhaps the most significant symbol of harmonization progress made in the 21st century is the single electronic form of technical documentation that companies use to prepare registration dossiers. As a joke, they now recall the time when it was necessary to take a truck to deliver the entire volume of registration dossier documents to the regulatory authorities.

In the field of harmonization of standards for the production of pharmaceuticals, the process currently underway is a direct reflection of the reality of the supply of most APIs to the US and European countries from India and China. Two years ago, the Food and Drug Administration and the United States (USP) opened offices in China, India and Latin America. The presence of representative offices and USPs directly in the producing countries has improved their interaction with local regulatory authorities, manufacturers and pharmacopoeias.

Progress in Harmonization of Pharmacopoeias, APIs and Excipients

Harmonization of Pharmacopoeias began about 10 years ago. Over time, good cooperation has been established between the US, Japanese and European Pharmacopoeias. However, harmonization in this area is a long and extremely laborious process. For example, the US Patent Documentation Group (USP's PDG) has only worked out 27 out of 34 general statements and 40 out of 63 excipient monographs so far.

Attempts are being made to harmonize monographs up to finished drugs.

At the global level, harmonization of the quality parameters of APIs and excipients is one of the key issues. It is planned that the USA will contain monographs on all pharmaceutical excipients according to the list. This will create an international working group dissemination of best practices. European Quality Directorate medical preparations(The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare - EDQM) has established bilateral relations with the US FDA and its equivalent agency in Australia
(Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration – TGA) on the exchange of confidential information on APIs and excipients. As part of these agreements, as a pilot project, mutual inspections began last year.

Several possibilities are being considered for global harmonization of quality parameters for excipients. One of them is the application of requirements for the production of excipients; the other is the participation of manufacturers in a voluntary program of inspection of production facilities by independent auditors. The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Auditing is registering with the American national institute standards, allowing it to serve as an independent quality auditor.

Remaining Differences

Harmonization does not mean a literal repetition of all procedures for the registration of pharmaceutical products. There will always be differences in the approaches taken by different regulatory agencies. Even within the framework of one European Union, a new one can be registered “centrally”, i.e. through EU authorities, or go through registration with national agencies. The US FDA's strategy is to harmonize the safety requirements for pharmaceuticals in the US and the EU, although some differences in approaches and procedures will still remain.

National specificity is visible on the example of the inspection of pharmaceutical production. The US FDA, for example, focuses on abnormality investigations, validation rules, and the maintenance and cleanliness of equipment and manufacturing facilities. In the EU countries, the main efforts are focused on the compliance with the cleanliness of the premises and their classification, the maintenance of equipment and laboratory control. In Japan, inspectors place increased demands on the quality of raw materials, the cleanliness of production equipment and appearance finished pharmaceutical preparations.

"Pharmaceutical industry", April No. 2 (19) 2010

Page content

The Eurasian Economic Commission has developed a draft Rule for conducting research on biological medicines in the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The purpose of the document is to simplify the collection and provision of data attached to applications for registration of biological drugs.

The rules are necessary for the formation of a common drug market in the EAEU, which will start operating from January 1, 2016. From this date, safe, effective and high-quality drugs will be able to move freely throughout the Union.

The draft Rules have been developed on the basis of the provisions set out in the relevant documents of the International Conference on the Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Medicines (ICH) and the European Medical Agency (EMA).

The document regulates the development, safety, efficacy and quality studies of both new molecules of biological drugs and biosimilar drugs. At the same time, the Rules have chapters on general research issues: from banks that produce cells to finished drugs. There is a separate chapter that contains drug-specific requirements for the development, production and research of biosimilar drugs.

Strict adherence to the Rules will help pharmaceutical manufacturers to complete the full cycle of studying biological products, confirm their safety, quality and effectiveness, ensuring that the reproduced biomolecules correspond to their prototypes. This will allow you to replace medications given their comparable safety and efficacy.

It should be noted that the Rules are mandatory for the authorized bodies and expert organizations when performing the procedure for assessing the safety, quality and effectiveness of this group of drugs in the process of evaluating their registration dossiers.

A high degree of harmonization of the Rules with the requirements of relevant international documents will facilitate the process of entering the named drugs on foreign markets, will facilitate the recognition of data on pharmaceutical development and the results of confirmation of safety, quality and efficacy during their registration outside the Union.

The draft decision of the EEC Council on the approval of the Rules for conducting trials of biological medicines in the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union is published on the websites of the Eurasian Economic Union in the section "Public Discussions and ODS" and the Eurasian Economic Commission on the page of the Department of Technical Regulation and Accreditation of the EEC in the section "Public discussion of draft regulatory legal acts".

All interested parties may, within 30 days from the date of publication of the draft document, submit comments to the EEC Department for Technical Regulation and Accreditation.

Reference

To biological medicines include immunobiological and biotechnological drugs, drugs derived from human blood plasma, probiotics (eubiotics), bacteriophage drugs, high-tech drugs.

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Medicines (ICH) is an organization that brings together regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry in Europe, Japan and the United States to discuss the scientific and technical aspects of drug registration.

European Medical Agency (EMA) is an EU agency responsible for the scientific evaluation of medicines developed by pharmaceutical companies for use in the EU.

To start your search, start typing your search term in the search field. The terms and phrases found in the dictionary will be shown in the drop-down list (the first 30). For more accurate results, continue typing your search phrase or select a different search mode.

Depending on the selected search mode, the dictionary searches for the search term either from the beginning of each term/phrase, or anywhere in the term/phrase, or searches for its exact match. You can also use the alphabetical index above to search for a term/phrase.

You can select a term/phrase from the drop-down list using the mouse or the up/down arrow keys (after selecting, press the Enter key to display the dictionary entry card)

On the right is a column with the last five terms added to the dictionary, as well as the history of your search in the dictionary (the last ten search queries). The history is stored on your computer and can be deleted at any time (to do this, click on the "clear" link)

If you are looking in mode "from the beginning of the phrase" and found nothing, then try switching to the mode "anywhere in the phrase".

Dictionary entry comprises: search term(displayed at the beginning along with a direct link to the dictionary entry) and translation options. Each translation option may include: information from canceled term or not, and recommended instead of him, definition of this term, indicated in the original document (in italics), note to the definition specified in the document or the note of the compilers of the dictionary, document's name from which the term/phrase is taken and date added to the dictionary.

We are constantly updating and updating the dictionary. If you find an error, inaccuracy in the terminology or work of the dictionary, or want to suggest a new feature, please contact us by mail: [email protected] .

We hope that the dictionary will help you in your daily work. We wish you a pleasant use!